Countries in this Region

	ISO2	ISO3	ISO3 Number
Djibouti	DJ	DJI	262
Eritrea	ER	ERI	232
Ethiopia	ET	ETH	231
Kenya	KE	KEN	404
Rwanda	RW	RWA	646
Somalia	SO	SOM	706
South Sudan	SS	SSD	728
Sudan	SD	SDN	736
Uganda	UG	UGA	800
United Republic of Tanzania	TZ	TZA	834

State Indicators

State Description

State indicators reflect the conditions of the land as well as its resilience to withstand change as a consequence of sector pressures. This may include indicators which express changes in biological productivity (actual and potential), extent and impacts of soil degradation, including erosion, salinization, etc., annual and long-term balance of nutrients (exported and imported by the cropping systems), degree and type of contamination or pollution (by direct application, atmospheric transport, etc.), changes in organic matter content, water holding capacity, etc. The changes in state may be negative with poor management, or positive with good management. © FAO Link

No indicators yet

Pressure Indicators

Pressure Description

Indicators in this group include those activities that relate to the degree of intensification and diversification of agricultural land uses, and result in increased pressure on land quality. This may include the number of crops in a cropping system per year or per hectare, type and intensity of tillage, degree of removal of biomass, integration with livestock systems, number of food and fibre products produced annually, etc. These indicators must be seen within the context of major socio-demographic factors such as population pressures, land tenure, etc., but the latter do not qualify for inclusion as LQIs. This is because these major forces do not influence land quality directly, but rather through the land practices that are adopted by farmers as a consequence. It is these management systems and their impacts that we wish to capture as LQIs, although changes in the major driving forces may provide some "early warning" signals. © FAO Link

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Since 2002, an increasing number of protected areas have been involved in the project. In fact, all MIKE sites but one overlap, either entirely or partly, with protected areas included in the World Database of Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC).

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

In Central Africa, 16 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas. In Western Africa, 17 out of 18 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas, only one site (Nazinga Gamme Ranch) is not included in the World Database of Protected Areas. In Eastern Africa (EA), 16 designated MIKE sites overlap with 67 protected areas. In Southern Africa, 18 designated MIKE sites overlap with 33 protected areas.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

The CITES Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE) Programme and the follow up project Minimizing the Illegal Killing of Elephants and other Endangered Species (MIKES) have maintained a site-based system designed to monitor trends in the illegal killing of elephants, build management capacity and provide information to help range States make appropriate management and enforcement decisions.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nyr_rep,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

{ "id": "MIKE_sites_gen", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=MIKE_sites_gen&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Response Indicators

Response Description

The response mechanisms are normally achieved through direct actions by the farmers themselves in evolving or adopting improved land management systems, or through complementary activities whereby adoption of conservation technologies is stimulated by general economic, agricultural and conservation policies and programmes. In rare instances, environmental regulations may be necessary to effect proper control of land resource degradation. Response indicators may include number and types of farmer organizations for soil conservation, extent of change in farm technologies, risk management strategies, incentive programmes for adoption of conservation technologies, etc. Response indicators should be distinguished into those categories promoted by governments, those undertaken by individual farmers and those supported by agri-business. © FAO Link

Global
Regional
National
Local

Progresses towards Nature Needs Half by ecoregions

Protected area coverage of Caribbean coral reefs (%)

Restoring opportunities for ecoregions

Area of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged (km2)

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Number of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged

Area of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged (km2)

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Number of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged

No indicators yet

Protected Area Solutions

These solutions are provided by the PANORAMA – Solutions for a Healthy Planet initiative and are published on the PANORAMA web platform.

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

Document	Document Type	Publication year
URL: A review of studies on ecosystem services in Africa	Scientific paper	2016
URL: Biodiversity and ecosystem services on the African continent – What is changing, and what are our options?	Scientific paper	2020
Document: Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Closing the gap: The financing and resourcing of protected and conserved areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Closing the gap: The financing and resourcing of protected and conserved areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020) - Knowledge Brief	Regional assessment, Other	2020
Document: Djibouti Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Djibouti Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Djibouti NBSAP 2017	NBSAP	2017
Document: Djibouti NBSAP 2017	NBSAP	2017
Document: Eritrea Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Eritrea Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Ethiopia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National Report, Technical report	2020
Document: Ethiopia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
URL: GESTION DURABLE DES FORÊTS ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE EN AFRIQUE: Améliorer la valeur, les avantages et les services Document: GESTION DURABLE DES FORÊTS ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE EN AFRIQUE: Améliorer la valeur, les avantages et les services	Scientific paper, Technical report	2016
URL: How effective are the protected areas of East Africa?	Regional assessment, Scientific paper	2019
URL: How effective are the protected areas of East Africa?	Regional assessment, Scientific paper	2019
Document: International Outlook for Privately Protected Areas: Ethiopia Country Profile (2019)	National assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: International Outlook for Privately Protected Areas: Ethiopia Country Profile (2019)	National assessment, Technical report	2019
URL: IUCN PAPACO Website with RAPPAM, METT and EoH Assessments in Africa	Site-level assessment, National assessment, Regional assessment, Technical report, Other	2020
	Technical report	2019
Document: Kenya Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Kenya Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley, Kenya: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2014
Document: Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley, Kenya: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2014
Document: Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Kilimanjaro National Park, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Kilimanjaro National Park, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Lake Turkana National Parks, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Lake Turkana National Parks, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa	Regional assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (Executive Summary)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest, Kenya: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2014
Document: Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest, Kenya: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2014
Document: Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest, Kenya: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Natural World Heritage in Africa: Progress and Prospects (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
URL: NBSAP for Tanzania	NBSAP	2019
Document: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Protected Area Governance and Equity Chapter - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Protected Area Management Effectiveness Chapter - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
URL: Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa’s protected area network	Scientific paper	2020
URL: Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa’s protected area network	Scientific paper	2020
Document: Rwanda Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Rwanda Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: RWANDA NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN	NBSAP	2016
Document: Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Uganda: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Uganda: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Sanganeb Marine National Park and Dungonab Bay – Mukkawar Island Marine National Park, Sudan: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Sanganeb Marine National Park and Dungonab Bay – Mukkawar Island Marine National Park, Sudan: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Simien National Park, Ethiopia: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2014
Document: Simien National Park, Ethiopia: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2014	Site-level assessment	2014
Document: Simien National Park, Ethiopia: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Simien National Park, Ethiopia: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Somalia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Somalia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: South Sudan Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: South Sudan Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Sudan Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Sudan Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Tanzania Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Tanzania Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Uganda Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Uganda Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
URL: Western Indian Ocean Marine Protected Areas Outlook 2021 Document: Western Indian Ocean Marine Protected Areas Outlook 2021	Regional assessment	2021

You might also be interested in other regions:

Countries in this Region

State Indicators

Pressure Indicators

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Response Indicators

This map shows the percentage of imperiled ecoregions that are not protected out of the total present in each country.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Area Solutions

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

SIGN IN TO BIOPAMA

Enter your details below.