Countries in this Region

	ISO2	ISO3	ISO3 Number
Angola	AO	AGO	24
Botswana	BW	BWA	72
Comoros	KM	COM	174
Eswatini	SZ	SWZ	748
Lesotho	LS	LSO	426
Madagascar	MG	MDG	450
Malawi	MW	MWI	454
Mauritius	MU	MUS	480
Mozambique	MZ	MOZ	508
Namibia	NA	NAM	516
Seychelles	SC	SYC	690
South Africa	ZA	ZAF	710
Zambia	ZM	ZMB	894
Zimbabwe	ZW	ZWE	716

State Indicators

State Description

State indicators reflect the conditions of the land as well as its resilience to withstand change as a consequence of sector pressures. This may include indicators which express changes in biological productivity (actual and potential), extent and impacts of soil degradation, including erosion, salinization, etc., annual and long-term balance of nutrients (exported and imported by the cropping systems), degree and type of contamination or pollution (by direct application, atmospheric transport, etc.), changes in organic matter content, water holding capacity, etc. The changes in state may be negative with poor management, or positive with good management. © FAO Link

No indicators yet

Pressure Indicators

Pressure Description

Indicators in this group include those activities that relate to the degree of intensification and diversification of agricultural land uses, and result in increased pressure on land quality. This may include the number of crops in a cropping system per year or per hectare, type and intensity of tillage, degree of removal of biomass, integration with livestock systems, number of food and fibre products produced annually, etc. These indicators must be seen within the context of major socio-demographic factors such as population pressures, land tenure, etc., but the latter do not qualify for inclusion as LQIs. This is because these major forces do not influence land quality directly, but rather through the land practices that are adopted by farmers as a consequence. It is these management systems and their impacts that we wish to capture as LQIs, although changes in the major driving forces may provide some "early warning" signals. © FAO Link

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Since 2002, an increasing number of protected areas have been involved in the project. In fact, all MIKE sites but one overlap, either entirely or partly, with protected areas included in the World Database of Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC).

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

In Central Africa, 16 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas. In Western Africa, 17 out of 18 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas, only one site (Nazinga Gamme Ranch) is not included in the World Database of Protected Areas. In Eastern Africa (EA), 16 designated MIKE sites overlap with 67 protected areas. In Southern Africa, 18 designated MIKE sites overlap with 33 protected areas.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

The CITES Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE) Programme and the follow up project Minimizing the Illegal Killing of Elephants and other Endangered Species (MIKES) have maintained a site-based system designed to monitor trends in the illegal killing of elephants, build management capacity and provide information to help range States make appropriate management and enforcement decisions.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nyr_rep,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

{ "id": "MIKE_sites_gen", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=MIKE_sites_gen&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Response Indicators

Response Description

The response mechanisms are normally achieved through direct actions by the farmers themselves in evolving or adopting improved land management systems, or through complementary activities whereby adoption of conservation technologies is stimulated by general economic, agricultural and conservation policies and programmes. In rare instances, environmental regulations may be necessary to effect proper control of land resource degradation. Response indicators may include number and types of farmer organizations for soil conservation, extent of change in farm technologies, risk management strategies, incentive programmes for adoption of conservation technologies, etc. Response indicators should be distinguished into those categories promoted by governments, those undertaken by individual farmers and those supported by agri-business. © FAO Link

Global
Regional
National
Local

Progresses towards Nature Needs Half by ecoregions

Protected area coverage of Caribbean coral reefs (%)

Restoring opportunities for ecoregions

Area of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged (km2)

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Number of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged

Area of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged (km2)

Deforestation between 2001 and 2016 within protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

Number of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) logged

No indicators yet

Protected Area Solutions

These solutions are provided by the PANORAMA – Solutions for a Healthy Planet initiative and are published on the PANORAMA web platform.

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

Document	Document Type	Publication year
Document: A journey through the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA) (2020)	Other	2020
Document: A journey through the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA) (2020)	Other	2020
URL: A review of studies on ecosystem services in Africa	Scientific paper	2016
Document: Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Angola Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Angola Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: Biodiversity and ecosystem services on the African continent – What is changing, and what are our options?	Scientific paper	2020
Document: Botswana Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Botswana Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Cape Floral Region Protected Areas, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Cape Floral Region Protected Areas, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Closing the gap: The financing and resourcing of protected and conserved areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Closing the gap: The financing and resourcing of protected and conserved areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020) - Knowledge Brief	Regional assessment, Other	2020
Document: Communities and Biodiversity in Angola: Analysis of the legal and institutional framework for community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management (2018)	Technical report	2018
Document: Communities and Biodiversity in Angola: Analysis of the legal and institutional framework for community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management (2018)	Technical report	2018
Document: Comoros Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Comoros Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Eswatini Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Eswatini Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: International Outlook for Privately Protected Areas: South Africa Country Profile (2019)	National assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: International Outlook for Privately Protected Areas: South Africa Country Profile (2019)	National assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: IUCN PAPACO Website with RAPPAM, METT and EoH Assessments in Africa	Site-level assessment, National assessment, Regional assessment, Technical report, Other	2020
Document: Lake Malawi National Park, Malawi: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2013	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2013
Document: Lake Malawi National Park, Malawi: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2013	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2013
Document: Lake Malawi National Park, Malawi: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Lake Malawi National Park, Malawi: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Lesotho Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Lesotho Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
URL: Linking ecosystem services to livelihoods in southern Africa	Scientific paper	2018
Document: Madagascar Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Madagascar Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Malawi Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Malawi Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Maloti-Drakensberg Park, Lesotho & South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Maloti-Drakensberg Park, Lesotho & South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas, Zimbabwe: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas, Zimbabwe: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa	Regional assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: Management Effectiveness, Governance, and Social Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (Executive Summary)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2019
Document: Mauritius Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Mauritius Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Mlawula Nature Reserve Management Plan	Management Plan	2020
Document: Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls, Zambia & Zimbabwe: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls, Zambia & Zimbabwe: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Mozambique Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Mozambique Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Namib Sand Sea, Namibia: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Namib Sand Sea, Namibia: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Namibia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Namibia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Natural World Heritage in Africa: Progress and Prospects (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Okavango Delta, Botswana: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Okavango Delta, Botswana: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: PLAN D'AMENAGEMENT ET DE GESTION DE LA NOUVELLE AIRE PROTEGEE MENABE ANTIMENA Document: PLAN D'AMENAGEMENT ET DE GESTION DE LA NOUVELLE AIRE PROTEGEE MENABE ANTIMENA	Technical report	2014
URL: PLAN D'AMENAGEMENT ET DE GESTION DE LA NOUVELLE AIRE PROTEGEE MENABE ANTIMENA Document: PLAN D'AMENAGEMENT ET DE GESTION DE LA NOUVELLE AIRE PROTEGEE MENABE ANTIMENA	Technical report	2014
Document: Protected Area Governance and Equity Chapter - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Protected Area Management Effectiveness Chapter - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Rainforests of the Atsinanana, Madagascar: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2013	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2013
Document: Rainforests of the Atsinanana, Madagascar: Enhancing our Heritage (EoH) Assessment 2013	Site-level assessment, Technical report	2013
Document: Rainforests of the Atsinanana, Madagascar: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Rainforests of the Atsinanana, Madagascar: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Seychelles Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Seychelles Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: South Africa Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: South Africa Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	Regional assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve, Madagascar: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Vallée de Mai Nature Reserve, Seychelles: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Vallée de Mai Nature Reserve, Seychelles: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Vredefort Dome, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
Document: Vredefort Dome, South Africa: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: Western Indian Ocean Marine Protected Areas Outlook 2021 Document: Western Indian Ocean Marine Protected Areas Outlook 2021	Regional assessment	2021
Document: Zambia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Zambia Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Zimbabwe Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020
Document: Zimbabwe Country Profile - State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa (2020)	National assessment, Technical report	2020

You might also be interested in other regions:

Countries in this Region

State Indicators

Pressure Indicators

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Response Indicators

This map shows the percentage of imperiled ecoregions that are not protected out of the total present in each country.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Area Solutions

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

SIGN IN TO BIOPAMA

Enter your details below.